Duties and Responsibilities
With this background and context in mind, the Project Evaluation has the following objectives:
Assess the relevance of UN Women contribution to engaging women in preventing and countering violent extremist in Kenya;
Assess effectiveness and organizational efficiency in progressing towards the achievement of women’s participation in preventing and countering violent extremist in Kenya;
Assess the sustainability of the intervention in achieving sustained engagement of women in preventing and countering violent extremist in Kenya;
Analyze how human rights approach and gender equality principles are integrated in the implementation of the project;
Identify and validate lessons learned, good practices and examples and innovations of efforts that support women’s participation in preventing and countering violent extremist in Kenya;
Provide actionable recommendations with respect to the UN Women intervention.
Relevance
The key evaluation questions are:
To what extent is the intervention relevant to the needs and priorities as defined by beneficiaries;
How relevant and appropriate is the Theory of Change underlying the project to achieving the objectives;
To what extent is the UN Women’s strengthening rights-holders’ participation and duty-bearer’s accountability; ensuring that the most vulnerable populations know, demand and enjoy their human rights and reinforcing capacities of duty bearers to respect, protect and guarantee these rights.
Effectiveness
To what extent were the expected outcomes achieved and how did UN Women contribute towards these;
To what extent have effective partnerships and strategic alliances been promoted.
Efficiency
Have adequate financial resources been allocated into the realization of the project results;
Are the implementation mechanisms effective in managing the Programme;
How efficiently resources/inputs (funds, expertise, time, etc.) have been converted to strategic results.
Sustainability
To what extent was capacity developed in order to ensure sustainability of efforts and benefits;
How will the benefits of the intervention be secured for rights holders (i.e. what accountability and oversights systems were established).
Gender Equality And Human Rights
To what extent has gender and human rights considerations been integrated into the project design and implementation;
How has attention to integration of gender equality and human rights concerns advanced the women’s participation in preventing and countering violent extremist in Kenya.
Evaluation Design (Methods And Process)
The evaluation will be an external, participatory, and iterative learning exercise, which should be completed within a timeframe of 15 working days. The Evaluation will be conducted under the guidance of the UN Women Kenya Deputy Country Director.
Internal arrangements – The Senior Management Team will constitute the Reference Committee for the Evaluation, signing off and providing direction at key milestones. The role of Senior Management will also include final approval authority on evaluation deliverables, and the Evaluation Reference Group (ERG).
The role of the ERG is to serve as consultative body and sounding board for the evaluation, allow stakeholders to express their information needs and enhance learning and ownership of evaluation findings. The ERG provides feedback on specific evaluation questions, on evaluation inception and draft report and helps with providing background information to the evaluation team as relevant. The ERG includes both UN Women staff and partners.
Methods to assess the project outcomes and impact will include open and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, a comprehensive review of documents, a synthesis and analysis of data from regular programme monitoring as well as field visits. Interviews with beneficiaries and local partners using participatory review and evaluation methodologies will be strongly encouraged.
The evaluation will be carried following UN Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms and Standards ( http://www.unwomen.org/about-us/accountability/evaluation/ ), UN Women Evaluation Policy as well as the Ethical Guidelines for evaluations in the UN system, see Annex to this TOR. Once finalized the evaluation report will be quality-assessed based on the UN Women Global Evaluation Reports Assessment and Analysis System (GERAAS). GERAAS standards and GERAAS rating matrix are available at http://www.unwomen.org/en/about-us/evaluation/decentralized-evaluations .
Deliverables
The findings and recommendations of the evaluation will be thoroughly discussed with the UN Women and Partners.
The Key Deliverables Of The Evaluation Are
Inception report outlining the design- criteria, scope, methodology, data collection method and tools and time frame including a Draft Report Template: Submission of a draft report format containing Table of Contents for the final report for approval by UN Women;
The Draft and Final Reports: The report should address the contents specified in section IV and use a format that will be provided during inception phase. It should be logically structured, contain evidence-based findings, conclusions, lessons and recommendations, and should be free of information that is not relevant to the overall analysis. The report should respond in detail to the key focus areas described above. It should include a set of specific recommendations formulated for the project, and identify the necessary actions required to be undertaken, who should undertake those and possible time-lines (if any). Stakeholders will provide comments on the Draft Report, and the consultants will finalize the report in view of these comments;
Presentation: For presenting and discussing the draft final report interactively, the consultants will facilitate a one-day concluding workshop for the project stakeholders.
The Inception report should include an evaluation matrix with evaluation questions and -criteria, indicators, data sources and methods of data collection.
The Draft/ Final Report Should Follow The Following Structure
Title page, Table of Contents and Acronyms;
Executive Summary;
Background and purpose of the evaluation;
Programme description and context;
Evaluation methodology and limitations;
Findings;
Analysis and Conclusions;
Recommendations;
Lessons learned (if applicable);
Annexes: Terms of Reference, List of documents reviewed, list of agencies and partners interviewed (without direct reference to individuals), evaluation matrix and data collection instruments, any other relevant documents.
Competencies
Integrity
Core Values/Guiding Principles:
Demonstrate consistency in upholding and promoting the values of UN Women in actions and decisions, in line with the UN Code of Conduct.
Professionalism
Demonstrate professional competence and expert knowledge of the pertinent substantive areas of work.
Cultural Sensitivity And Valuing Diversity
Demonstrate an appreciation of the multicultural nature of the organization and the diversity of its staff;
Demonstrate an international outlook, appreciating difference in values and learning from cultural diversity.
Ethics And Values
Core Competencies:
Demonstrate and safeguard ethics and integrity.
Organizational Awareness
Demonstrate corporate knowledge and sound judgment.
Development And Innovation
Take charge of self-development and take initiative.
Work In Teams
Demonstrate ability to work in a multicultural, multi ethnic environment and to maintain effective working relations with people of different national and cultural backgrounds.
Communicating And Information Sharing
Facilitate and encourage open communication and strive for effective communication.
Self-management And Emotional Intelligence
Stay composed and positive even in difficult moments, handle tense situations with diplomacy and tact, and have a consistent behavior towards others.
Conflict Management
Surface conflicts and address them proactively acknowledging different feelings and views and directing energy towards a mutually acceptable solution.
Continuous Learning And Knowledge Sharing
Encourage learning and sharing of knowledge.
Appropriate And Transparent Decision Making
Demonstrate informed and transparent decision making.
Functional Competencies
Excellent analytical and communication skills;
Demonstrated ability to produce high quality evaluation reports, including recommendations for future work of the funding organization/ a donor;
Understanding of the Kenyan context with specific regards to the gender priorities and role of UN Women;
Knowledge of issues concerning women’s human rights and gender equality including specifically in the area of gender based violence, ii) familiarity with the relevant context in Kenya will be an added advantage.
Education
Required Skills and Experience
At least a master’s degree in development studies, economics, political science, public policy /and or relevant field of social sciences.
Experience
At least seven years of planning, reviews and/or evaluation experience, five years of which in planning/reviews in development programs related to human rights, gender and results-based evaluations;
Knowledge and experience with the national development frameworks, especially National Development Goals (MDGs), PRSP, SWAP, key legislation, etc.;
Extensive experience with UN programming, especially the UNDAF and delivering as one.
Language
Fluent in English;
Knowledge of local language an asset.
go to method of application »
